Chad: From Bad To Worse
Jayashree , bangalore: Jul 12 2008
Made Popular Jul 12 2008

The Republic of Chad, situated between Niger to the west and Sudan to the east, will be celebrating nearly half a century of independence in a month. But this central African country with its beautiful Saharan sandstones and wealth of wildlife does not have much to celebrate. The constant revolts by armed militants and wars with neighbouring and distant countries have left the people poverty stricken and starved for nutritious food, and peace.

How the state of affairs transgressed to this level is not a surprising matter considering the fact that even though the country is rich in oil, gold and uranium, it is known as one of the most corrupt nations of the world. This status was elevated even more by the president, Idriss Déby, who came to power in 1990. In a deal with World Bank to construct a pipeline connecting the oil fields in Chad with neighbouring Cameroon, President Déby grudgingly agreed to spend 70% of the income derived from oil revenues on education and improving the quality of life. Yet, half the country’s population remains sadly uneducated, and the rest are battling for survival.

Anti-government insurgents in most parts of eastern Chad have captured the attention of the government and humanitarian aid organisations, although survivability for volunteers is uncertain due to attacks by these rebel groups. The number of Sudanese refugees from the war-stricken area of Darfur has only increased over the past years and stands at nearly 300,000. They are joined by over 150,000 internally displaced civilians. At a time where life expectancy hovers around 50 years of age, the quality of life has fallen below tolerable levels. In such a situation, the state of children has been upmost in the minds of humanitarian aid organisations active in Chad.

As outlined by the latest statistics from twelve refugee camps scattered in the east, children have no means of continuing their education beyond the eighth grade, except informally. Nearly one-third of them work a 7-10 hour period daily and often older children have to give up the meagre chances for studies to look after their younger siblings. About 15% have various disabilities and, though resilient, children still bear emotional disturbances from the numerous cruelties they have suffered. Orphaned children experience physical and sexual abuse, and young girls have been found most vulnerable to sexual abuse and teenage pregnancies. Underage boys stand much risk to being recruited into the Chadian army and paramilitary forces, as also into rebel groups.

Although most humanitarian aid organisations such as Oxfam, MSF Holland, IRD, etc. have concentrated on the war-stricken eastern areas, it is the western region of Chad that is most in need of attention. Kanem, a region in the west just above Lake Chad, has the highest chronic malnutrition level in the whole country. Chronic malnutrition occurs over a period of years as a result of inadequate diet and is considered more life-threatening than severe malnutrition. Children suffering from chronic malnutrition are more at risk for premature death, lowered immunodeficiency system and stunted growth. Poor sanitation and eating practices and weaning habits of babies by the mothers have left the young under 3 years with the highest malnutrition levels. In the light of these statistics, aid organizations and NGOs that had earlier quit these regions for the crisis hit east are returning to set up camp. They may already be too late if OCHA’s prediction that food, medicine and water would only last four weeks turns out to be true.

The disintegrating state of Chad can only be alleviated if the government started to take a stronger interest in its people than its oil industry. Negotiations with rebel groups may help ease the amount of attacks, as it did a few years ago when hundreds of rebel soldiers were recruited into the national army. Unless something is done, either with or without the help of the humanitarian organizations active in the country, the people of Chad may not have a future to look forward to.

chad_M3SxL_18095

Add Images and Videos
Close X
Recommended Tags or Keywords
Search by Tags or Keywords
Selected Media ( You can Upload only Six media )
Manual Upload
Sorry, no media found for this combination of tags. Try to search minimum number of tags at once
1 Stars
Grace
Quezon City, Philippines
I am appalled at how Africa can’t get it’s act together when the countries really share the misery together.

It’s a whole lot of missed opportunity because they all could be sharing together the fruits of the richness of the land’s resources.

It’s governments that destroy their people. Very sad.
0 Stars
Jaiyant Cavale
Bangalore, India
So rarely do we read anything about Chad. Many people outside Africa may not even know the country’s plight. Colonizing countries have a moral responsibility to at least provide some sort of relief which I doubt is ever going to happen. While Carla unveils her new album in France, children in Chad must moan a song of misery, without an audience
2 Stars
Jayashree
bangalore, India
@Grace What’s sad is that Chad suffers not only because of the revolts within the country, but also because of the fighting in Sudan. Chad is expected to feed and take care of the thousands of refugees pouring in from Darfur when it is not able to take care of it’s own.

But then it’s not just Africa. Unity in any continent has only been at a superficial level.

@Jaiyant The role of France in Chad is suspicious. The debate is still open as to whether any involvement by France is good for Chad.

Chaddian rebels accuse the French of encouraging Déby’s corrupt governance because they still wish to rule over Chad, even if indirectly. On the other hand, Déby believes the French are backing the rebels. This looks unlikely since it was with the help of the French militia that Déby was able to defeat the rebels a couple years ago. He even insists that the EUFOR force, which mostly consists of French soldiers, have a soft spot for the rebels.

A number of French aid organisations are also active in Chad, including MSF which was founded by the present foreign minister. But then I guess we can’t really call them ’French’ since they are NGOs. And then, who can forget the ’Zoe of Ark’ incident..

I guess we can only hope the situation in Chad, and Sudan, ameliorates over the next few years. Thanks for the comments!
1 Stars
Grace
Quezon City, Philippines
Right, Jayashree. Chad is reeling from the exodus of Darfuri refugees.

But that really is what it’s all about, you know. African nations are inescapably geographically interlocked. That’s their reality. So, what they should do really is interlock, too, in unified Africa.

These countries have been subsisting on external aid for ages. They should get their act together now. And they can, in fact, if they want to since Africa is very rich in minerals, metals, and oil.
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Jaiyant Cavale
Bangalore, India
The African Union which is already in existence is marred by opposing sides. Wealthier African Nations such as South Africa, Egypt and a couple others have a disdainful attitude towards the real sub saharan Africa. Probably because foreign investors don’t like to invest in these wealthier countries if they associate themselves with poorer countries. hence, getting their act together may just remain a diplomatic ’vision’ while the prosperous governments scramble to hog all investments
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Grace
Quezon City, Philippines
It’s the grand stage of geopolitics. It’s a matter of who are friends of the US and UK and who are the ones trading with China (who learned better artillery-making skills from Russia).

And all these are set against the grim backdrop of desertification, not enough potable water, food aid and regular shortfalls of it, militias, and thousands and thousands of dying men, women, and children.
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Jaiyant Cavale
Bangalore, India
As many past leaders have suggested, one must really shun products from the west, especially luxury products. These luxury products have a root or come from these poor countries. Somebody had said China is a sleeping monster or something akin to that. I guess she has finally woke up. Wars are being fought for oil now, very soon wars will be fought for water. Israel uses more water than many Palestinians can even imagine. So, desertification would cause wars as well
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Lathyfa
Male, Maldives
Lets keep our fingers crossed that the situation reverts to the positive side....
(Global Perspectives)
2 Stars
Jaiyant Cavale
Bangalore, India
It is weird because so much is said and written about Darfur, but nothing about Chad. If you ask me I really didn’t know about the state of affairs in Chad until I read here and elsewhere on the net. So France does have a military presence in Chad, unlike what I thought. The NGOs that you are talking about do mean good but apparently they don’t receive much funds from the EU, though EU plans to send more boys to Chad. The rebels don’t seem to be that noble either. The corrupt government has a better record than the rebels, if what I read is to be believed
1 Stars
Grace
Quezon City, Philippines
Yes, Jaiyant, Darfur and the whole of Sudan is unique in their unfortunate experience. Except that Darfur has been hogging the limelight, so to speak, because the US called it a ’genocide’ and much publicity has been generated by the Save Darfur Coalition, what with the appended Hollywood names such as George Clooney, et al.
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Grace
Quezon City, Philippines
Sorry, I meant ’Darfur and the whole of Sudan is NOT unique in their unfortunate experience.’

I missed typing in ’NOT.’
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Grace
Quezon City, Philippines
Sorry again! That should be ’Darfur and the whole of Sudan ARE NOT unique in their unfortunate experience.’

Hehe..
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Jaiyant Cavale
Bangalore, India
The US is behind Darfur’s popularity because they don’t like the government and see it as a threat. Sudanese government is one of the more anti American governments around. So, bringing focus to Darfur would help them serve their needs. However, the attention given to Darfur (which was of course needed and I’m happy Darfur still makes it to the headlines) has done little to them. Its saddening that Sudanese people infiltrate to Chad, another rebel infested country. the difference being Chad is ’boring’ to major powers either because they don’t pose a threat or there is nothing to exploit.

Hey that’s okie.. Yeah people in Khartoum seem untouched by the realities in their non-Arab parts of the nation
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Grace
Quezon City, Philippines
General Omar al-Bashir is busy with the ka-ching-ching-ching! Hahaha!
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Jayashree
bangalore, India
I could be wrong, but I think I remember recently reading about Sarkozy signing a deal to give Chad 10 million euro as relief. It seems he was embarrassed about the state of Chad at the time that he succeeded Chirac. And he was even more disturbed when it was announced that those children were ’abducted’ with permission from French offcials, including his ex-wife.
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Grace
Quezon City, Philippines
Yup, those will be the next great wars. Warring over water. Maybe, Australia will be at war, too. :) It’s experiencing a big drought now, and it’s getting worse.
1 Stars
Lathyfa
Male, Maldives
Hey....now u’ve hooked me onto Chad too.....wish it was Chad Murray u r talking about.....this piece of writing is superb luv.....keep it up.....
1 Stars
Philippe Boucher
Pretoria, South Africa
Those who suggest the ”colonising nations” are to blame for Africa’s situation, or have a moral responsibility to continue providing costly aid, simply do not get it.

The introduction of a more advanced culture into a primitive one is, if anything, a blessing. Witness the rise in African life expectancy, literacy rates and living conditions during colonisation.

Consider the truth in jest revealed by this famous Monty Python sketch: John Cleese’s parody of Judea under Roman rule. Cleese and his band of anti-Roman rebels are debating the merits and demerits of the enemy. So, “What have the Romans ever done for us?” asks Cleese. “The aqueduct,” one rebel ventures. A second says, “Sanitation, remember what the city used to be like?” A third praises the roads. A fourth, the public baths. Exacerbated by the growing list of Roman improvements, rebel-in-chief Cleese responds: “All right, but apart from the sanitation, the medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, a fresh water system, and public health, what have the Romans ever done for us?”

Let’s not forget that Hong Kong, Malaysia and even America are former colonies. There are numerous other examples of former colonies that today have evolved into prosperous, powerful and peaceful nations. Why not Africa?

The answer lies in the Africans themselves. The world, especially the Western world, are doing all they can to uplift Africa but the people are simply not ready for the modern world. They have yet to develop the attitudes, institutions and abilities to live in the world of today. Throwing money at them or allowing them to blame others simply exacerbates the problem.
1 Stars
Grace
Quezon City, Philippines
There is a hefty price to pay for the ’good’ that colonization supposedly gives. It’s never a completely beneficial package. While the apparent effects of colonization can have apparent benefits, the evil lies in the not so palpable effects of one culture transgressing into another.

I live in a country that was under three colonizers for more than 333 years. These did some good, as well as turned the people confused with what and who they are.

We also have to note that the West in Africa is there for a motive, not just an intention.
(Global Perspectives)
2 Stars
Philippe Boucher
Pretoria, South Africa
You are of course right. Nothing is this world is entirely good. Nor is it ever entirely bad - I am making the point that colonisation has had many tangible benefits, good points that on the whole outweigh the bad. I’m sure we can all agree that things such as life expectancy are more important than nebulous cultural effects. Only those who’ve never known starvation or fatal disease would argue otherwise.

Colonisation was something done first and foremost in the interests of the colonising nations, therefore never intended to have had purely beneficial effects on the nations in question. History shows however, that oppressed majorities are never long conquered and inevitably absorb their colonial rulers.

The difference between Africa and the rest of the world is that all other nations have integrated and kept what is useful from the outside culture, while rejecting their governance. Your country, The Philippines, is another excellent example. I believe that today they have the 37th largest economy in the world. Korea might be considered too... The point is, if colonisation were truly the Great Satan it’s made out to be, the subsequent success of such nations would hardly be possible.

All the evidence suggests that the state of Africa is a direct result of the backwards nature of the Africans. So long as colonisation is maintained as a convenient, politically correct scapegoat for African failure, no real progress is possible. And unless progress is made, Africa is doomed to be recolonised. As natural resources dwindle, increasing competition will drive this already-apparent trend. Personally, I see recolonisation as sadly inevitable - Africans have been granted enormous enviromental advantages, and if they are unable or unwilling to take advantage then someone else will put Africa to good use.
2 Stars
Grace
Quezon City, Philippines
I believe you. Recolonization is inevitable since such associations as UN and AU have proven to be ineffective.

I think that the very first thing neo-colonizers or re-colonizers should do in Africa is to unify the all and sundry clans and tribes there are in the continent.

Sadly, the tools new colonizers have only consist of armaments, artillery, and arsenals.

Spain has a very effective colonizing tool inn religion. America had education as a leveling tool.

The reason countries played into the colonizing game in the past is because they saw and felt the benefits of what colonizers had to offer. Religion and education were deemed highly beneficial components of progress, much to the pleasure of colonizers.

Today, what benefit can arms sell to the people? All they get are bloodshed, poverty, and extremely wide swathes of misery.

As the old colonizers learned, you don’t really conquer from the barrel of a gun. At best, you can only divide.
(Global Perspectives)
Add your Comment