The Republic of Chad, situated between Niger to the west and Sudan to the east, will be celebrating nearly half a century of independence in a month. But this central African country with its beautiful Saharan sandstones and wealth of wildlife does not have much to celebrate. The constant revolts by armed militants and wars with neighbouring and distant countries have left the people poverty stricken and starved for nutritious food, and peace.
How the state of affairs transgressed to this level is not a surprising matter considering the fact that even though the country is rich in oil, gold and uranium, it is known as one of the most corrupt nations of the world. This status was elevated even more by the president, Idriss Déby, who came to power in 1990. In a deal with World Bank to construct a pipeline connecting the oil fields in Chad with neighbouring Cameroon, President Déby grudgingly agreed to spend 70% of the income derived from oil revenues on education and improving the quality of life. Yet, half the country’s population remains sadly uneducated, and the rest are battling for survival.
Anti-government insurgents in most parts of eastern Chad have captured the attention of the government and humanitarian aid organisations, although survivability for volunteers is uncertain due to attacks by these rebel groups. The number of Sudanese refugees from the war-stricken area of Darfur has only increased over the past years and stands at nearly 300,000. They are joined by over 150,000 internally displaced civilians. At a time where life expectancy hovers around 50 years of age, the quality of life has fallen below tolerable levels. In such a situation, the state of children has been upmost in the minds of humanitarian aid organisations active in Chad.
As outlined by the latest statistics from twelve refugee camps scattered in the east, children have no means of continuing their education beyond the eighth grade, except informally. Nearly one-third of them work a 7-10 hour period daily and often older children have to give up the meagre chances for studies to look after their younger siblings. About 15% have various disabilities and, though resilient, children still bear emotional disturbances from the numerous cruelties they have suffered. Orphaned children experience physical and sexual abuse, and young girls have been found most vulnerable to sexual abuse and teenage pregnancies. Underage boys stand much risk to being recruited into the Chadian army and paramilitary forces, as also into rebel groups.
Although most humanitarian aid organisations such as Oxfam, MSF Holland, IRD, etc. have concentrated on the war-stricken eastern areas, it is the western region of Chad that is most in need of attention. Kanem, a region in the west just above Lake Chad, has the highest chronic malnutrition level in the whole country. Chronic malnutrition occurs over a period of years as a result of inadequate diet and is considered more life-threatening than severe malnutrition. Children suffering from chronic malnutrition are more at risk for premature death, lowered immunodeficiency system and stunted growth. Poor sanitation and eating practices and weaning habits of babies by the mothers have left the young under 3 years with the highest malnutrition levels. In the light of these statistics, aid organizations and NGOs that had earlier quit these regions for the crisis hit east are returning to set up camp. They may already be too late if OCHA’s prediction that food, medicine and water would only last four weeks turns out to be true.
The disintegrating state of Chad can only be alleviated if the government started to take a stronger interest in its people than its oil industry. Negotiations with rebel groups may help ease the amount of attacks, as it did a few years ago when hundreds of rebel soldiers were recruited into the national army. Unless something is done, either with or without the help of the humanitarian organizations active in the country, the people of Chad may not have a future to look forward to.
But then it’s not just Africa. Unity in any continent has only been at a superficial level.
@Jaiyant The role of France in Chad is suspicious. The debate is still open as to whether any involvement by France is good for Chad.
Chaddian rebels accuse the French of encouraging Déby’s corrupt governance because they still wish to rule over Chad, even if indirectly. On the other hand, Déby believes the French are backing the rebels. This looks unlikely since it was with the help of the French militia that Déby was able to defeat the rebels a couple years ago. He even insists that the EUFOR force, which mostly consists of French soldiers, have a soft spot for the rebels.
A number of French aid organisations are also active in Chad, including MSF which was founded by the present foreign minister. But then I guess we can’t really call them ’French’ since they are NGOs. And then, who can forget the ’Zoe of Ark’ incident..
I guess we can only hope the situation in Chad, and Sudan, ameliorates over the next few years. Thanks for the comments!
But that really is what it’s all about, you know. African nations are inescapably geographically interlocked. That’s their reality. So, what they should do really is interlock, too, in unified Africa.
These countries have been subsisting on external aid for ages. They should get their act together now. And they can, in fact, if they want to since Africa is very rich in minerals, metals, and oil.
And all these are set against the grim backdrop of desertification, not enough potable water, food aid and regular shortfalls of it, militias, and thousands and thousands of dying men, women, and children.
I missed typing in ’NOT.’
Hehe..
Hey that’s okie.. Yeah people in Khartoum seem untouched by the realities in their non-Arab parts of the nation
The introduction of a more advanced culture into a primitive one is, if anything, a blessing. Witness the rise in African life expectancy, literacy rates and living conditions during colonisation.
Consider the truth in jest revealed by this famous Monty Python sketch: John Cleese’s parody of Judea under Roman rule. Cleese and his band of anti-Roman rebels are debating the merits and demerits of the enemy. So, “What have the Romans ever done for us?” asks Cleese. “The aqueduct,” one rebel ventures. A second says, “Sanitation, remember what the city used to be like?” A third praises the roads. A fourth, the public baths. Exacerbated by the growing list of Roman improvements, rebel-in-chief Cleese responds: “All right, but apart from the sanitation, the medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, a fresh water system, and public health, what have the Romans ever done for us?”
Let’s not forget that Hong Kong, Malaysia and even America are former colonies. There are numerous other examples of former colonies that today have evolved into prosperous, powerful and peaceful nations. Why not Africa?
The answer lies in the Africans themselves. The world, especially the Western world, are doing all they can to uplift Africa but the people are simply not ready for the modern world. They have yet to develop the attitudes, institutions and abilities to live in the world of today. Throwing money at them or allowing them to blame others simply exacerbates the problem.
I live in a country that was under three colonizers for more than 333 years. These did some good, as well as turned the people confused with what and who they are.
We also have to note that the West in Africa is there for a motive, not just an intention.
Colonisation was something done first and foremost in the interests of the colonising nations, therefore never intended to have had purely beneficial effects on the nations in question. History shows however, that oppressed majorities are never long conquered and inevitably absorb their colonial rulers.
The difference between Africa and the rest of the world is that all other nations have integrated and kept what is useful from the outside culture, while rejecting their governance. Your country, The Philippines, is another excellent example. I believe that today they have the 37th largest economy in the world. Korea might be considered too... The point is, if colonisation were truly the Great Satan it’s made out to be, the subsequent success of such nations would hardly be possible.
All the evidence suggests that the state of Africa is a direct result of the backwards nature of the Africans. So long as colonisation is maintained as a convenient, politically correct scapegoat for African failure, no real progress is possible. And unless progress is made, Africa is doomed to be recolonised. As natural resources dwindle, increasing competition will drive this already-apparent trend. Personally, I see recolonisation as sadly inevitable - Africans have been granted enormous enviromental advantages, and if they are unable or unwilling to take advantage then someone else will put Africa to good use.
I think that the very first thing neo-colonizers or re-colonizers should do in Africa is to unify the all and sundry clans and tribes there are in the continent.
Sadly, the tools new colonizers have only consist of armaments, artillery, and arsenals.
Spain has a very effective colonizing tool inn religion. America had education as a leveling tool.
The reason countries played into the colonizing game in the past is because they saw and felt the benefits of what colonizers had to offer. Religion and education were deemed highly beneficial components of progress, much to the pleasure of colonizers.
Today, what benefit can arms sell to the people? All they get are bloodshed, poverty, and extremely wide swathes of misery.
As the old colonizers learned, you don’t really conquer from the barrel of a gun. At best, you can only divide.
Local Opinions (0)
Global Opinions (21)
It’s a whole lot of missed opportunity because they all could be sharing together the fruits of the richness of the land’s resources.
It’s governments that destroy their people. Very sad.
But then it’s not just Africa. Unity in any continent has only been at a superficial level.
@Jaiyant The role of France in Chad is suspicious. The debate is still open as to whether any involvement by France is good for Chad.
Chaddian rebels accuse the French of encouraging Déby’s corrupt governance because they still wish to rule over Chad, even if indirectly. On the other hand, Déby believes the French are backing the rebels. This looks unlikely since it was with the help of the French militia that Déby was able to defeat the rebels a couple years ago. He even insists that the EUFOR force, which mostly consists of French soldiers, have a soft spot for the rebels.
A number of French aid organisations are also active in Chad, including MSF which was founded by the present foreign minister. But then I guess we can’t really call them ’French’ since they are NGOs. And then, who can forget the ’Zoe of Ark’ incident..
I guess we can only hope the situation in Chad, and Sudan, ameliorates over the next few years. Thanks for the comments!
But that really is what it’s all about, you know. African nations are inescapably geographically interlocked. That’s their reality. So, what they should do really is interlock, too, in unified Africa.
These countries have been subsisting on external aid for ages. They should get their act together now. And they can, in fact, if they want to since Africa is very rich in minerals, metals, and oil.
I missed typing in ’NOT.’
Hehe..
And all these are set against the grim backdrop of desertification, not enough potable water, food aid and regular shortfalls of it, militias, and thousands and thousands of dying men, women, and children.
Hey that’s okie.. Yeah people in Khartoum seem untouched by the realities in their non-Arab parts of the nation
The introduction of a more advanced culture into a primitive one is, if anything, a blessing. Witness the rise in African life expectancy, literacy rates and living conditions during colonisation.
Consider the truth in jest revealed by this famous Monty Python sketch: John Cleese’s parody of Judea under Roman rule. Cleese and his band of anti-Roman rebels are debating the merits and demerits of the enemy. So, “What have the Romans ever done for us?” asks Cleese. “The aqueduct,” one rebel ventures. A second says, “Sanitation, remember what the city used to be like?” A third praises the roads. A fourth, the public baths. Exacerbated by the growing list of Roman improvements, rebel-in-chief Cleese responds: “All right, but apart from the sanitation, the medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, a fresh water system, and public health, what have the Romans ever done for us?”
Let’s not forget that Hong Kong, Malaysia and even America are former colonies. There are numerous other examples of former colonies that today have evolved into prosperous, powerful and peaceful nations. Why not Africa?
The answer lies in the Africans themselves. The world, especially the Western world, are doing all they can to uplift Africa but the people are simply not ready for the modern world. They have yet to develop the attitudes, institutions and abilities to live in the world of today. Throwing money at them or allowing them to blame others simply exacerbates the problem.
I live in a country that was under three colonizers for more than 333 years. These did some good, as well as turned the people confused with what and who they are.
We also have to note that the West in Africa is there for a motive, not just an intention.
Colonisation was something done first and foremost in the interests of the colonising nations, therefore never intended to have had purely beneficial effects on the nations in question. History shows however, that oppressed majorities are never long conquered and inevitably absorb their colonial rulers.
The difference between Africa and the rest of the world is that all other nations have integrated and kept what is useful from the outside culture, while rejecting their governance. Your country, The Philippines, is another excellent example. I believe that today they have the 37th largest economy in the world. Korea might be considered too... The point is, if colonisation were truly the Great Satan it’s made out to be, the subsequent success of such nations would hardly be possible.
All the evidence suggests that the state of Africa is a direct result of the backwards nature of the Africans. So long as colonisation is maintained as a convenient, politically correct scapegoat for African failure, no real progress is possible. And unless progress is made, Africa is doomed to be recolonised. As natural resources dwindle, increasing competition will drive this already-apparent trend. Personally, I see recolonisation as sadly inevitable - Africans have been granted enormous enviromental advantages, and if they are unable or unwilling to take advantage then someone else will put Africa to good use.
I think that the very first thing neo-colonizers or re-colonizers should do in Africa is to unify the all and sundry clans and tribes there are in the continent.
Sadly, the tools new colonizers have only consist of armaments, artillery, and arsenals.
Spain has a very effective colonizing tool inn religion. America had education as a leveling tool.
The reason countries played into the colonizing game in the past is because they saw and felt the benefits of what colonizers had to offer. Religion and education were deemed highly beneficial components of progress, much to the pleasure of colonizers.
Today, what benefit can arms sell to the people? All they get are bloodshed, poverty, and extremely wide swathes of misery.
As the old colonizers learned, you don’t really conquer from the barrel of a gun. At best, you can only divide.
Home

Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Stumble Upon
Technorati
Mixx
Sphinn
Twitter
SphereIt
Propeller
Gmarks
Newsvine
Yahoo! My Web
Live Journal
Blinklist
E-mail
RSS 








It’s a whole lot of missed opportunity because they all could be sharing together the fruits of the richness of the land’s resources.
It’s governments that destroy their people. Very sad.